But can anything else be said about the potential difference between the obligating content of “the Law of spirit and life” and “the Law of sin and death” (8:2)? Though requiring a longer treatment in its own right, it is important to recognize that given the Law’s incapacity to resurrect (Gal 3:21), and given Paul’s conviction that human bodies will become immortal in the resurrection (1 Cor 15:42–53), it may be that some of the Law’s commandments cease to function then (in the resurrection) as they do now. The difference between the ages, their respective bodies, and the commandments, though, lies not in the insignificance of the Law in Paul’s thought, but due to the supposition that the Law given to Israel regulates mortal bodies subject to impurity and death.

However, once resurrected and immortal, humans will possess bodies no longer subject to decay and impurity, and as such, laws that regulate such impurity will cease to be of significance. Without death and dying, purity regulations cease to be needed. Thus, it is not “the impurity laws” themselves that cease, but impurity. This kind of legal reasoning is evident in Luke 20, wherein the Sadducees present Jesus with the scenario of one woman having married several brothers before asking, “In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife will she be?” (Luke 20:33). Jesus’s response is telling: “The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage, but those who are considered worthy to attain to that age and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage, for neither can they die anymore, for they are like angels, and are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection” (Luke 20:34–36). The change in the material quality of the resurrection body impacts a law that legislates marriage not because the “law” is insignificant but because it legislates a condition (mortal bodies that must procreate, the context of which is marriage in Jesus’s setting) that no longer obtains in the resurrection given the deathlessness of the bodies of that age. - Paul T. Sloan, Jewish Law-Observance in Paul

Rather than simply distancing his audience from the Law in itself, Paul says that because the Law, experienced without the Spirit, entangles one with sin and thus with death, what is needed is liberation from “sin” (cf. 6:6–11) and “the Law of sin and death” (8:2), which is the commandment seized by sin that leads the one “in the flesh” to death (7:11–13). 

Significantly, Paul goes on to say that “dying to the Law” liberates one from sin and death, not “Law” generally or even the Mosaic Law specifically. This becomes clear at the closing of Romans 7 and the transition to Romans 8 (see King 2017), wherein the members of one’s fleshly body were captive to “the Law of sin” (7:23), but with the gift of the Spirit, those in Christ who “walk according to the Spirit” can fulfill the Law’s requirement (τὸ δικαίωµα τoῦ νóµoυ) (8:4). Thus, having “died to the Law” (or possibly “by the Law”) (7:4; cp. Gal 2.19) and having been “released from the Law” (7:6) most plausibly refer to the liberation from “the Law of sin”, by which he means the Law as “seized” by “sin”, which effects death (7:9–13). The problem surrounding the Law, then, was not “the Law” itself, but the fleshly composition of its recipients (8:3), who, when told not to covet, were not equipped to fulfill this demand - Paul T. Sloan, Jewish Law-Observance in Paul

Significantly, Paul does not in Galatians or elsewhere blame the Law or criticize it for this function of “killing”; rather, like many Second Temple Jews, he interpreted Israel’s history after the giving of the Law as one of disobedience and covenant violation that incurred the promised discipline, leading to Israel’s “death”. - Paul T. Sloan, Jewish Law-Observance in Paul

My teaching on the healing of the woman with the issue of blood and the raising of Jairus's daughter from Luke 8. Notes. Audio 1. Audio 2. 

Moreover, a few verses not routinely interrogated along these lines (Rom 4:11–16) suggest that Paul continued to regard the Law and its keeping as a defining characteristic of Jewish social identity that he expected to perdure at least until the general resurrection. Such expected Law-keeping does not function at the soteriological register, as if Paul thought Jews merited salvation by Law-observance; rather, according to Paul’s reasoning, such Jewish Law-keeping expressed their belonging to those “of the circumcision”, a people whose existence and perdurance Paul regards as ordained by God as one of the nations comprising Abraham’s promised “seed”.  - Paul T. Sloan, Jewish Law-Observance in Paul.

“It’s all about Jesus” is often used as a cop out for neglecting important passages, commands, and themes in Scripture. Of course it’s all about Him, for He alone is preeminent, but it’s about Him on His terms, not ours. “All Scripture is God-breathed.” - BA Purtle

If your worldview is characterized by a sense of victimhood, entitlement, and suspicion, you haven't got a hold of a Christian one. Some stranger, some hired hand, some wolf has laid hold of your ear. Break free immediately, and find the voice of the Good Shepherd again. - BA Purtle

Drunk Lot impregnated his daughter, who bore Moab, whence came Ruth, the great-grandmother of David, the king who murdered Bathsheba's husband and with her fathered Solomon, who filled Jerusalem with idolatry.

Christ's genealogy preaches his will to save even the most messed up of families. - Chad Bird

“In the matter of Christ’s second coming and kingdom, the church of Christ has not dealt fairly with the prophecies of the Old Testament. For too long we have refused to see that there are two personal advents of Christ spoken of in those prophecies: an advent in humiliation and an advent in glory, an advent to suffer and an advent to reign, a personal advent to carry the cross and a personal advent to wear the crown.” - JC Ryle

Via BA Purtle

“You see, brother, how many THOUSANDS there are among the Jews of those who have believed [the Gospel...]" -Acts 21:20

The idea that the "Jews rejected Christ" in the first century is a total myth. There was no difference in terms of Jewish vs. Gentile acceptance/rejection of the Gospel at this time.

Thousands of people coming to faith from one people group (in this case Jews) is actually an amazing result! Ask any missionary today! - Travis M. Snow

Hubris is common. It emits from us easily.

Humility is uncommon— a product of cruciformity.

Pray that you may be truly humble— seeing Christ acutely, treating others rightly.

At the last day you will not regret a meek life. “The meek”, not the proud, “shall inherit the earth.”

-BA Purtle

There perhaps millions of people asking afresh today, "Who or what is Israel?"

J.C. Ryle would like a word. This is from his book, "Coming Events and Present Duties," chapter 5. It was written in 1867.

------------------------

The MEANING of the word "Israel."

"The definition of terms is of first importance in theology. Unless we explain the meaning of the words we use in our religious statements, our arguments are often wasted, and we seem like men beating the air. The word 'Israel' is used nearly seven hundred times in the Bible. I can only discover three senses in which it is used.

First, it is one of the names of Jacob, the father of the twelve tribes; a name specially given to him by God.

Second, it is a name given to the ten tribes which separated from Judah and Benjamin in the days of Rehoboam and became a distinct kingdom. This kingdom is often called Israel in contradistinction to the kingdom of Judah.

Thirdly and lastly, it is a name given to the whole Jewish nation, to all members of the twelve tribes which sprang from Jacob and were brought out of Egypt into the land of Canaan. This is by far the most common signification of the word in the Bible. It is the only signification in which I can find the word 'Israel' used through the whole New Testament. It is the same in which the word is used in the text which I am considering this day. That Israel, which God has scattered and will yet gather again — is the whole Jewish nation.

Now, why do I dwell upon this point? To some readers it may appear mere waste of time and words to say so much about it. The things I have been saying sound to them like truisms. That Israel means Israel, is a matter on which they never felt a doubt. If this be the mind of any into whose hands this address has fallen, I am thankful for it. But unhappily there are many Christians who do not see the subject with your eyes. For their sakes I must dwell on this point a little longer.

For many centuries there has prevailed in the Churches of Christ a strange, and to my mind, an unwarrantable mode of dealing with this word 'Israel.' It has been interpreted in many passages of the Psalms and Prophets, as if it meant nothing more than Christian believers. Have promises been held out to Israel? Men have been told continually that they are addressed to Gentile saints. Have glorious things been described as laid up in store for Israel? Men have been incessantly told that they describe the victories and triumphs of the Gospel in Christian Churches. The proofs of these things are too many to require quotation. No man can read the immense majority of commentaries and popular hymns without seeing this system of interpretation to which I now refer.

Against that system I have long protested, and I hope I shall always protest as long as I live. I do not deny that Israel was a peculiar typical people, and that God's relations to Israel — were meant to be a type of His relations to His believing people all over the world. I do not forget that it is written, 'As face answers to face, so does the heart of man to man' (Proverbs 27:19), and that whatever spiritual truths are taught in prophecy concerning Israelitish hearts — are applicable to the hearts of Gentiles. I would have it most distinctly understood that God's dealings with individual Jews and Gentiles — are precisely one and the same. Without repentance, faith in Christ, and holiness of heart — no individual Jew or Gentile shall ever be saved.

What I protest against is the habit of allegorizing plain sayings of the Word of God concerning the future history of the nation Israel and explaining away the fullness of their contents in order to accommodate them to the Gentile Church! I believe the habit to be unwarranted by anything in Scripture, and to draw after it a long train of evil consequences.

Where, I would venture to ask, in the whole New Testament shall we find any plain authority for applying the word 'Israel' to anyone but the nation Israel? I can find none. On the contrary, I observe that when the Apostle Paul quotes Old Testament prophecies about the privileges of the Gentiles in Gospel times, he is careful to quote texts which specially mention the 'Gentiles' by name. The fifteenth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans is a striking illustration of what I mean.

We are often told in the New Testament that under the Gospel believing Gentiles are 'fellow-heirs and partakers of the same hope' with believing Jews (Ephesians 3:6). But that believing Gentiles may be called 'Israelites,' I cannot see anywhere at all.

To what may we attribute that loose system of interpreting the language of the Psalms and Prophets, and the extravagant expectations of universal conversion of the world by the preaching of the Gospel, which may be observed in many Christian writers? To nothing so much, I believe, as to the habit of inaccurately interpreting the word 'Israel,' and to the consequent application of promises — to the Gentile Churches with which they have nothing to do!

The least errors in theology always bear fruit. Never does man take up an incorrect principle of interpreting Scripture, without that principle entailing awkward consequences and coloring the whole tone of his religion. Reader, I leave this part of my subject here. I am sure that its importance cannot be overrated. In fact, a right understanding of it lies at the very root of the whole Jewish subject, and of the prophecies concerning the Jews. The duty which Christians owe to Israel, as a nation, will never be clearly understood, until Christians clearly see the place that Israel occupies in Scripture.

Before going any further, I will ask all readers of this address one plain practical question. I ask you to calmly consider — What sense do you put on such words as 'Israel,' 'Jacob,' and the like — when you meet with them in the Psalms and Prophecies of the Old Testament? We live in a day when there are many Bible readers. There are many who search the Scriptures regularly and read through the Psalms and the Prophets once, if not twice, every year they live. Of course you attach some meaning to the words I have just referred to. You place some sense upon them. Now what is that sense? What is that meaning? Take heed that it is the right one.

Reader, accept a friendly exhortation this day. Cleave to the literal sense of Bible words and beware of departing from it — except in cases of absolute necessity. Beware of that system of allegorizing and spiritualizing and accommodating, which the school of Origen first brought in, and which has found such an unfortunate degree of favor in the Church. In reading the authorized version of the English Bible, do not put too much confidence in the 'headings' of pages and 'tables of contents' at beginnings of chapters, which I consider to be a most unhappy accompaniment of that admirable translation. Remember that those headings and tables of contents were drawn up by uninspired hands. In reading the Prophets, they are sometimes not helps, but real hindrances and less likely to assist a reader than to lead him astray. Settle it in your mind, in the reading the Psalms and Prophets, that Israel means Israel; and Zion means Zion; and Jerusalem means Jerusalem.

And, finally, whatever edification you derive from applying to your own soul the words which God addresses to His ancient people — never lose sight of the primary sense of the text."

-BA Purtle

Look at Jesus. He is always weeping, a man of sorrows. Do you know why? Because He is perfect. When you are not absorbed in yourself, you can feel the sadness of the world. - Timothy Keller

“Prayer does not fit us for the greater work; prayer is the greater work. The work in prayer is the labor of birth.” - Oswald Chambers 

via BA Purtle

Likewise, the parables of the mustard seed and leaven (Matt. 13:31–33) would have been understood negatively, spoken “to them” (v. 13) and interpreted apocalyptically, in light of “the end of the age” (v. 40). These two terse parables are simply negative teaching devices with a single player, akin to the parables of the rich fool (Luke 12:16–21), the barren fig tree (Luke 13:6–9), and the counting of the costs (Luke 14:28–33). Leaven was commonly understood as a bad thing (cf. Ex. 12:15–20; 34:25; Lev. 2:11; Matt. 16:6, 11–12; 1 Cor. 5:6–8; Gal. 5:9), and the allusion to Nebuchadnezzar concerning the mustard seed (Matt. 13:32; cf. Dan. 4:12) probably evoked highly negative emotions in Jesus’ hearers. Thus the leaven and the mustard seed most likely would have been associated with the preceding and following “weeds” (vv. 25, 38), which were destined to be “burned” (vv. 30, 40)—especially since the mustard seed and leaven parables are given no explanation (a point rarely appreciated). In this way, they simply communicate that God, in his great mercy, will allow wickedness to grow to its full measure (an idea seen throughout the Scriptures; cf. Gen. 15:16; Dan. 8:23; Zech. 5:5; Matt. 23:32; 1 Thess. 2:16) until the judgment at the end of the age. Again, if the mustard seed and leaven parables are bookended by a parable concerning God allowing evil to continue to maturity, then should we not assume the unexplained parables in the middle to communicate the same message? - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified, p.278-279

Such a theology of Jewish election and stewardship weighs heavily in the discussion of the role of the Jews in the land of Israel today. Many argue vehemently that the Jews no longer have a role or calling in the land. Others say that the Jews retain a unique calling to keep the land. We must heartily affirm the latter. Though many in the land today are indeed apostate, that too was the case before the exile (cf. Isa. 3:9; Jer. 2:19) and before the ad 70 destruction of Jerusalem (cf. Acts 7:51; Rom. 11:25). Though the Jews have always fallen short (as have all Gentiles!), ought we not support their divine right to promulgate the oracles, of which the land itself stands at the forefront (cf. Ps. 72:8; 89:25; Zech. 9:10)?  - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified

The Great Reign (COVENANT AND CONTROVERSY) • First Teaser Trailer

My teaching on Zechariah 7-11. Notes. Audio 1. Audio 2. 

On the way to Gethsemane, Jesus also identified himself as “the shepherd”of Zechariah 13:7, saying, “You will all fall away because of me this night. For it is written, ‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered ’” (Matt. 26:31). Jesus had told his disciples earlier, “You will be scattered.  .  . and will leave me alone” (John 16:32), which found fulfillment during his arrest when “all the disciples left him and fled” (Matt. 26:56). Zechariah 11–13 broadly portrays this “shepherd” as being rejected (chap. 11), pierced (chap. 12), and struck (chap. 13) before the final vindication of the day of the Lord (chap. 14). So John quotes Zechariah 12:10 concerning the crucifixion:“These things took place that the Scripture might be fulfilled: . . . ‘They will look on him whom they have pierced’” (John 19:36–37). As with Isaiah 53, Zechariah 11–13 also leads up to a prophecy of eschatological glory in chapter14. Therefore Zechariah 12:10 is rightly quoted in light of the return of Jesus: “Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn over him. So it is to be. Amen” (Rev. 1:7, csb). - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified, p.195

The attempt to argue for a purely “spiritual” kingdom in this age, in contrast to a “visibly manifest” kingdom in the age to come, is patently Platonic. There is no immaterial world seeking to manifest itself in materiality. Rather, Jesus sits enthroned over the heavens and earth, waiting in mercy to judge the living and the dead. This age remains this age (Gal. 1:4; Titus 2:12), essentially characterized by the cross (Luke 24:47; Acts 3:19–21); and the age to come remains the age to come (cf. Eph. 1:21; Heb. 2:5), essentially characterized by judgment (Acts 10:42; 2 Tim. 4:1). Where in the Scriptures does the messianic kingdom ever precede the day of judgment? Rather, divine judgment always initiates the kingdom (cf. Ps. 2; Isa. 24; Dan. 7; Hab. 2–3; Zeph. 2–3; Zech. 12–14; Mal. 3–4). - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified, p.187

Moreover, just because the Jews cannot steward all of the oracles (e.g., the Davidic dynasty, temple service, etc.), should they not steward as many as possible? Modern Israel engages in many objectionable practices, of course, but should we not support and encourage righteous stewardship rather than the rejection of Jewish election altogether? If God chooses to discipline his stewards yet again and remove them from the land (as seems anticipated in Daniel 12:7, Joel 3:2, Zechariah 14:2, etc.), so be it. But woe to those who presume upon divine mercy and election. - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified, p.170-171

My teaching on the healing of the man with a legion of demons from Luke 8. Notes. Audio 1. Audio 2. 

Because Abraham was promised that he would inherit the land “from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates” (Gen. 15:18), so then his Seed will rule “from the River to the ends of the earth” (Ps. 72:8; Zech. 9:10). Such a geographical demarcation between the Euphrates and the ends of the earth confirms the geopolitical demarcation of the kingdom of God in the age to come. Hence the land of Canaan itself is a prophetic oracle, of sorts, inherently prophesying the age to come, and the Jews were and are stewards of that oracle (cf. Matt. 21:33; Rom. 3:2). - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified

The New Testament assumes Jesus to be “the son of Abraham” (Matt. 1:1; cf. Luke 3:34), and all the ethno-geographic characteristics of the Abrahamic covenant are simply assumed as part of Jesus’ messianic identity. His incarnational birth (Luke 1:31–32) was taken by Mary to mean, “He has helped his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy, as he spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his offspring forever” (vv. 54–55). The crowds “glorified the God of Israel” (Matt. 15:31) when they saw Jesus’ miracles. And Jesus’ entrance into Jerusalem on a colt was plainly understood in light of Zechariah’s messianic oracle (cf. Zech. 9:9), resulting in the declaration, “Blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord!” (Luke 19:38). This Messiah is “the King of the Jews” (Matt. 2:2; 27:11; Mark 15:26; Luke 23:37; John 19:3)—that is, “the King of Israel ” (Matt. 27:42; Mark 15:32; John 1:49; 12:13)—and thus divorcing Jesus from “the hope of Israel” (Acts 28:20) is senseless. - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified, p.130

History is thus portrayed as moving toward a unique and climactic end. Though mankind continues to exalt itself with ever-increasing zeal and ambition, “a day is coming for the Lord ” (Zech. 14:1), when God alone will be glorified and honored—for “all mankind will come to bow down before Me, says the Lord” (Isa. 66:23, nasb). Though our literature and history books write endlessly about the glory of mankind—our progression, our knowledge, our civilization—God will come and suddenly reverse the current of history. - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified, p.48

The primary element of apocalyptic thought is what the Bible calls “the day of the Lord” (Isa. 13:6, 9; Ezek. 30:3; Joel 1:15; 2:1, 11, 31; 3:14; Amos 5:18; Obad. 15; Zeph. 1:7, 14; Zech. 14:1; Mal. 4:5; Acts 2:20; 1 Cor. 5:5; 1 Thess. 5:2; 2 Thess. 2:2; 2 Peter 3:10). Spoken of first in the early prophetic literature, the day of YHWH becomes the focal point of prophetic declaration since “similar terms, particularly ‘that day,’ ‘the day of,’ and ‘the day when,’ appear nearly 200 times in the prophets.” - John P. Harrigan, The Gospel of Christ Crucified, p.46

Many scholars infer from these interactions that Jesus disregarded the food laws and purity to show that only love and faith matter (Dunn); "redefined" the nation's practices, swapping "allegiance to Torah" with "allegiance to himself" (Wright); or replaced purity with mercy (Borg). But a refined understanding of purity, sabbath halakha, and other contemporary legal debates will show that Jesus does none of these things. -  Paul T. Sloan, Jesus and the Law of Moses. 

Jesus didn’t use parables to impart hidden knowledge.

Instead, he employed them against those with hardened hearts.

“Because looking they do not see, and hearing they do not listen or understand” Matthew 13:13

Knowing this is key to understanding the parables. - Tyler Luedke

The "kingdom of the world" will manifestly become the "kingdom of our Lord and of His Christ," but not to the exclusion of the kingdom being restored to Israel. All of this has been fixed by the Father's own authority, and it's going to be marvelous. (Rev. 11.15; Acts 1.6-7) -BA Purtle

Theology 101: Orthodoxy often involves holding several vital truths in tension.

Heresy relieves the tension. - Dr. Michael Svigel

“Paul is revealing something extraordinary — that though Israel is currently experiencing a judicial blindness, there will come a time when ‘all Israel shall be saved.’ This is not merely the ongoing salvation of a small remnant of Jews throughout church history, but rather a future large‑scale conversion of Jews that will be so remarkable it will be ‘like life from the dead’ for the church.”

“Paul’s language … points to a future dramatic turning of the Jewish nation to Christ that will occur after ‘the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.’” - Martin Lloyd Jones, From Future of the Jews: Rom. 11.24-32, April 9, 1965

-Via BA Purtle

“I will restore the fortunes of My people Israel… They will rebuild the ruined cities and live in them… I will plant them on their land, and they will not again be rooted out from their land.” (Amos 9:14-15)

The apostle Paul—

“As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him.”

Divisiveness is a matter of church discipline. Don’t treat it lightly. - BA Purtle

The Roman satirist Lucian of Samosata mocked the martyrs as “misguided creatures (who) start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time…which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them.” Even the skeptical pagan recognized a life laid down as a witness to the Resurrection. Thus, in sickness, death, and martyrdom, the message of Christ was preached. - Graysen Borders, Gen Z: Miracles and Martyrdom

The spread of the Gospel throughout Rome in the 2nd and 3rd century is largely thanks to the faithfulness of believers in the face of intense suffering and persecution. Early church believers ministered to their impoverished neighbors by purchasing plots to provide proper burials for their loved ones free of charge. When publicly tortured and executed, male and female martyrs displayed such serenity and courage, even the hardened hearts of the Roman public were softened. - Graysen Borders, Gen Z: Miracles and Martyrdom

Jesus is the prize. If you felt personal guilt over your sins, repented, and decided to follow Jesus, you have everything because you have Him. If you experienced Jesus delivering you from darkness, repented, and decided to follow Jesus, you have everything because you have Him.

Miracles certainly reveal the character of Jesus and the trustworthiness of “He who promised” a Day when “there will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain.”

However, miracles are not the goal. The primary goal of our lives in this age is to bear witness to the King and the Kingdom that’s coming. Sometimes God will use miracles to accomplish this witness; often He uses our faithfulness through suffering instead.  - Graysen Borders, Gen Z: Miracles and Martyrdom

Herein lies a very important technicality: the purpose of these miracles was to introduce us to Jesus—not give us perfect emotional, mental, and physical health for the rest of our lives. That Day and that Kingdom is coming, but it has not yet arrived.

Miracles are being presented to my generation as an end-in-of-themselves and this teaching could have disastrous consequences. We’re being told we can expect and demand miracles from God if we just have enough faith. We’re being told God’s will is always to heal and deliver… every person… right now. When that’s not what happens, my generation has no answers or explanations for what went wrong. The Gospel of Emotional and Physical Wellness is pretty convincing to a young believer who just experienced a life-changing miracle—but it leads to a torrential spinout at the first unanswered prayer. - Graysen Borders, Gen Z: Miracles and Martyrdom

Remember, Lord, Your Church, to deliver it from all evil and to make it perfect in Your love, and gather it from the four winds, sanctified for Your kingdom which You have prepared for it; for Yours is the power and the glory forever. Let grace come, and let this world pass away. Hosanna to the God (Son) of David! If any one is holy, let him come; if any one is not so, let him repent. Maran atha. - Didache. 

Forrest Frank & Josiah Queen - JESUS IS COMING BACK SOON (Official Lyric...

Gen Z: Miracles & Martyrdom • THE INKWELL

At numerous points in history, the Church has betrayed our penchant to abandon the Gospel of Christ Crucified for a Gospel of Temporal Prosperity. And, honestly, who (but God) can blame us? Jesus was the worst salesman of all time. He preached against our biological drive for self-preservation: “Whoever wants to be My disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow Me.”

Satan, on the other hand, is a master of flattery. It’s his oldest and most effective tactic. Even once we discover that our lust for power and prosperity is poison, we still crave any message that accommodates that lust. We’re attracted to false hope and false prophets who cry out “peace, peace” when there is no peace.

-Graysen Borders, Gen Z: Miracles and Martyrdom

Jesus currently possesses all authority and will exercise that authority over the earth and nations at His second coming. - Mike Vlach

“God will invade…. When the author walks on to the stage the play is over. But what is the good of saying you are on His side then, when you see the whole natural universe melting away like a dream and something else—something it never entered your head to conceive—comes crashing in; something so beautiful to some of us and so terrible to others that none of us will have any choice left? For this time it will be God without disguise; something so overwhelming that it will strike either irresistible love or irresistible horror into every creature. It will be too late then to choose your side. There is no use saying you choose to lie down when it has become impossible to stand up. That will not be the time for choosing: it will be the time when we discover which side we really have chosen.” CS Lewis

My teaching on the Old Testament background to the healing of the demoniac in Luke 8. Notes. Audio 1. Audio 2. 

In many pulpits doctrine is preached, but not the cross; precepts are preached, but not the blood; philosophy is preached, but not the crucified Saviour. If it be so, in God’s name let us come back to Jesus Christ and him crucified. - Spurgeon

My teaching on the divinity of Jesus from Isaiah 45 and Philippians 2. Video. Audio 1. Audio 2. 

"For he [the Antichrist] being endued with all the power of the devil, shall come, not as a righteous king, nor as a legitimate king, in subjection to God, but an impious, unjust, and lawless one; as an apostate, iniquitous and murderous; as a robber, concentrating in himself satanic apostasy , and setting aside idols to persuade that he himself is God, raising up himself as the only idol, having in himself the multifarious errors of the other idols. This he does, in order that they who do worship the devil by means of many abominations, may serve himself by this one idol, of whom the apostle thus speaks in the second Epistle to the Thessalonians." (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.25.1)

Via Dr. Micheal Svigel

Dr. John Harrigan - Kingdom of God and the Lord's Prayer

Audio file. 

It's very important to understand that the Old Testament should be interpreted according to the historical-grammatical method. The primary question driving the interpretive process should be, what did this mean in its original historical context? 

This leaves room for symbolism, if that symbolism was intended by the original author. And it also leaves room for a literal approach, if the author intended something to be taken according to its plain, literal sense.

 

Many Christians go astray here because they either 

A) think that the NT justifies a strictly spiritual, Christological, or non-historical grammatical approach to the OT, or 

B) because they fall into a rigid fundamentalism that does not leave enough room for symbolic and figurative readings that are a part of the historical meaning. 

These are two sides of the same erroneous coin. 

The NT will never fundamentally alter the historical meaning of an OT text, and the OT will never fit within the framework of simplistic literalism. You always start with what the passage meant in it's original, historical context, being open to varying degrees of symbolism and literalism, and then once you have that figured out, you can also make spiritual and Christological applications of the OT text that complement, but never negate, the original meaning.- Travis M Snow

It seems most implausible that the Didache would modify such a pervasive doctrine of the general resurrection without any explanation. However, the puzzle can be easily solved if one considers that the Didachist’s language represents an early millennialism, in which the resurrection of the righteous saints (those “in Christ”) occurs at the return of Christ, followed by an earthly reign, which then ends with the resurrection of the wicked to judgment. Though it is not entirely clear that the original eschatology of the Didache was a form of early premillennialism, it seems more historically responsible to opt for an explanation that was known in the early church (resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked separated by a millennial kingdom), rather than point to this as an instance of unique teaching regarding the resurrection of the righteous only.  - Dr. Micheal Svigel, Go Deeper: Eschatology of the Didache

These themes are so common in the early church that one does not need to presume a written source. In fact, the language and imagery of the Didache’s portrayal of the end of the world is so unique that one ought to regard it as an independent testimony to the early church’s unified eschatological expectations. - Dr. Micheal Svigel, Go Deeper: Eschatology of the Didache